Efforts to impeach Obama have never been tried in this way before. This group is giving it a shot. We should worry its to little to late however if successful it does give the American Republic a chance to counter all of his laws, executive orders and various commands null and void.
Sad thing is even if he is impeached it won’t stop him from applying for the U.N. position he plans to occupy after his term is finished. This was one of the stands in which the American population should have impeached him for in the first place. As a President can not hold such a position in office. Not to mention the many other underhanded deeds of accepting a Knighthood from Arabia.
Lets hope this is successful.
Video Description:
Obama To Be Impeached
PLEASE SHARE THIS INFORMATION!
The North American Law Center has drafted a resolution entitled Articles of Impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama.
This document has been backed by committeeman Dave Agema, of the Michigan Branch on the Republican National Convention. As a result, Mr. Agema will present these Articles of Impeachment to the Republican National Committee at theie next meeting (January 13-15, 2016).
Among the charges in the impeachment resolution are: Usurpation of the Oval Office via criminal identity fraud; malfeasance, misconduct, and abuse of the Oval Office; and aiding and abetting known enemies of the United States.
If you support the information in this article PLEASE SHARE on your Social Media. It only takes a second of your time to click the provided share buttons. You show your support through your sharing.
FALSE EVIDENCE APPEARING REAL = FEAR , ABOUT YOUR FREEDOM AND SOVEREIGNTY
Copy this below and share it with EVERYONE you know! ACT OF 1871
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” — Preamble of the original “organic” Constitution “We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.” — Excerpted from the Declaration of Independence of the original thirteen united states of America, July 4, 1776 ////////////
Fourth of July 2002 has come and gone, and Americans honored the holiday with a renewed patriotic fervor that reminded me of the Bicentennial celebrations of 1976. As is customary, traditional fireworks displays took center stage and scores of people turned out to witness the dazzling show in the summer sky. With mixed feelings, I sat with friends on a crowded Pennsylvania sidewalk beneath a glittering, mesmerizing explosion of color, pondering the keen sense of sadness and betrayal that overwhelmed my spirit. Looking around at the huge crowds gathered for the annual events, I thought silently, “We are not free.” In truth, we have not been a free people for a very long time. We celebrate this day in honor of our “independence”. We call ourselves a free people in a land of liberty. Our anthems proudly sing the praises of this nation, and we raise our voices, wave our flags and join in song — but how many Americans realize they are not free? This is a myth perpetuated by the powers-that-be in order to avoid any major civil unrest, and to keep us all living under the thumb of a militaristic corporate Big Brother within the illusions that have been created for us. The truth of the matter is this: what freedom has not been stolen from us, we have surrendered willingly through our silence and ignorance. As Americans, most of us have no idea how our freedoms are maintained — or lost. Apparently, our ancestors didn’t have a good grasp of this either. It is sad, but it is also very true. Don’t point to that beloved parchment, the Constitution, as a symbol of your enduring freedom. It is representative of a form of government which seemingly no longer exists in this country today. The Constitution has been thrown out the window, the Republic shoved aside and replaced with a democracy. The thing is; most people in this country remain unaware that this is so because they simply do not know the truth — what lies beyond the myths. Your so-called government is not going to tell you, either. To even begin to understand what has happened to the Republic, we must look backward in time to the period following the Civil War. We must go back to the year 1871, which was the beginning of the decline of the Republic. When we examine what happened during that time in our history, we begin to piece together this troubling, perplexing puzzle that is “America” — only then should we answer as to whether we are indeed a “free” people or not. So, let’s roll backward into the past for a moment. It is time we learned what they didn’t teach us in school. It is far more interesting than what they DID tell us. I think you’ll stay awake for this lesson. The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the “Acts of the Forty-First Congress,” Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: “An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia.” This is also known as the “Act of 1871.” What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land. What??? How could they do that? Moreover, WHY would they do that? To explain, let’s look at the circumstances of those days. The Act of 1871 was passed at a vulnerable time in America. Our nation was essentially bankrupt — weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War. The Civil War itself was nothing more than a calculated “front” for some pretty fancy footwork by corporate backroom players. It was a strategic maneuver by European interests (the international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the neck (and the coffers) of America. The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone’s pie) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. If we think about banks, we know they do not just lend us money out of the goodness of their hearts. A bank will not do anything for you unless it is entirely in their best interest to do so. There has to be some sort of collateral or some string attached which puts you and me (the borrower) into a subservient position. This was true back in 1871 as well. The conniving international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States (a prize they had coveted for some time, but had been unable to grasp thanks to our Founding Fathers, who despised them and held them in check), and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed. In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original “organic” version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the “Act of 1871,” our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word “for” was changed to the word “of” in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner: “The Constitution for the united states of America”. The altered version reads: “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”. It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not. Capitalization — an insignificant change? Not when one is referring to the context of a legal document, it isn’t. Such minor alterations have had major impacts on each subsequent generation born in this country. What the Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia. The kind of government THEY created was a corporation. The new, altered Constitution serves as the constitution of the corporation, and not that of America. Think about that for a moment. Incidentally, this corporate constitution does not benefit the Republic. It serves only to benefit the corporation. It does nothing good for you or me — and it operates outside of the original Constitution. Instead of absolute rights guaranteed under the “organic” Constitution, we now have “relative” rights or privileges. One example of this is the Sovereign’s right to travel, which has been transformed under corporate government policy into a “privilege” which we must be licensed to engage in. This operates outside of the original Constitution. So, Congress committed TREASON against the People, who were considered Sovereign under the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. When we consider the word “Sovereign,” we must think about what the word means. According to Webster’s Dictionary, “sovereign” is defined as: 1. chief or highest; supreme. 2. Supreme in power, superior in position to all others. 3. Independent of, and unlimited by, any other, possessing or entitled to, original and independent authority or jurisdiction. In other words, our government was created by and for “sovereigns” — the free citizens who were deemed the highest authority. Only the People can be sovereign — remember that. Government cannot be sovereign. We can also look to the Declaration of Independence, where we read: “government is subject to the consent of the governed” — that’s supposed to be us, the sovereigns. Do you feel like a sovereign nowadays? I don’t. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian to figure out that this is not what is happening in our country today. Government in these times is NOT subject to the consent of the governed. Rather, the governed are subject to the whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles beyond the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia — encroaching into every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has NO jurisdiction outside of the District of Columbia. THEY just want you to think it does. You see, you are presumed to know the law. This is ironic because as a people, we are taught basically nothing about the law in school. We are made to memorize obscure factoids and paragraphs here and there, such as the Preamble, and they gloss over the Bill of Rights. But we are not told about the law. Nor do our corporate government schools delve into the Constitution in any great depth. After all, they were put into place to indoctrinate and dumb down the masses — not to teach us anything. We were not told that we were sold-out to foreign interests and made beneficiaries of the debt incurred by Congress to the international bankers. For generations, American citizens have had the bulk of their earnings confiscated to pay on a massive debt that they, as a People, did not incur. There are many, many things the People have not been told. How do you feel about being made a beneficiary of somebody else’s massive debt without your knowledge or consent? Are we gonna keep going along with this?? When you hear some individuals say that the Constitution is null and void, think about how our government has transformed over time from a municipal or service-oriented entity to a corporate or profit-oriented entity. We are living under the myth that this is lawful, but it is not. We are being ruled by a “de facto,” or unlawful, form of government — the corporate body of the death-mongers — The Controllers. With the passage of the Act of 1871, a series of subtle and overt deceptions were set in motion — all in conjunction and collusion with the Congress, who knowingly and deliberately sold the People down the river. Did they tell you this in government school? I doubt it. They were too busy drumming the fictional version of history into your brain — and mine. By failing to disclose what THEY did to the American People, the people became ignorant of what was happening. Over time, the Republic took it on the chin to the point of a knockdown. With the surrender of their gold in 1933, the People essentially surrendered their law. I don’t suppose you were taught THAT in school either. That’s because our REAL history is hidden from us. This is the way Roman Civil Law works — and our form of governance today is based upon Roman Civil Law and Admiralty/Maritime Law — better known as the “Divine Right of Kings” and “Law of the Seas”, respectively. This explains a lot. Roman Civil Law was fully established in the original colonies even before our nation began and is also known as private international law. The government which was created for the District of Columbia via the Act of 1871 operates under Private International Law, and not Common Law, which was the law of the Constitutional Republic. This is very important to note since it impacts all Americans in concrete ways. You must recognize that private international law is only applicable within the District of Columbia and NOT in the other states of the Union. The various arms of the corporation are known as “departments” such as the Judiciary, Justice and Treasury. You recognize those names? Yes, you do! But they are not what you assume them to be. These “departments” all belong to the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. They do NOT belong to you and me under the corporate constitution and its various amendments that operate outside of the Constitutional Republic. I refer you to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation (See Note). Realize, too, that the corporation is not a separate and distinct entity from the government. It IS the government. YOUR government. This is extremely important. I refer to this as the “corporate empire of the UNITED STATES,” which operates under Roman Civil Law outside of the Constitution. How do you like being ruled by a cheesy, sleazy corporation? You’ll ask your Congressperson about this, you say? HA!! Congress is fully aware of this deception. You must be made aware that the members of Congress do NOT work for you and me. Rather, they work for the Corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Is this really any surprise to you? This is why we can’t get them to do anything on our behalf or to answer to us — as in the case with the illegal income tax — among many other things. Contrary to popular belief, they are NOT our civil servants. They do NOT work for us. They are the servants of the corporate government and carry out its bidding. Period. The great number of committees and sub-committees that the Congress has created all work together like a multi-headed monster to oversee the various corporate “departments.” And, you should know that every single one of these that operates outside the District of Columbia is in violation of the law. The corporate government of the UNITED STATES has no jurisdiction or authority in ANY state of the Republic beyond the District of Columbia. Let this sink into your brain for a minute. Ask yourself, “Could this deception REALLY have occurred without the full knowledge and complicity of the Congress?” Do you think it happened by accident? You are deceiving yourself if you do. There are no accidents or coincidences. It is time to confront the truth and awaken from ignorance. Your legislators will not apprise you of this information. You are presumed to know the law. THEY know you don’t know the law, or your history for that matter, because this information has not been taught to you. No concerted effort has been made to inform you. As a Sovereign, you are entitled to full disclosure of the facts. As a slave, you are entitled to nothing other than what the corporation decides to “give” you — at a price. Be wary of accepting so-called “benefits” of the corporation of the UNITED STATES. Aren’t you enslaved enough already? I said (above) that you are presumed to know the law. Still, it matters not if you don’t in the eyes of the corporation. Ignorance of the law is not considered an excuse. It is your responsibility and your obligation as an American to learn about the law and how it applies to you. THEY count on the fact that most people are too uninterested or distracted or lazy to do so. The People have been mentally conditioned to allow the alleged government to do their thinking for them. We need to turn that around if we are to save our Republic before it is too late. The UNITED STATES government is basically a corporate instrument of the international bankers. This means YOU are owned by the corporation from birth to death. The corporate UNITED STATES also holds ownership of all your assets, your property, and even your children. Does this sound untrue? Think long and hard about all those bills you pay, all those various taxes and fines and licenses you must pay for. Yes, they’ve got you by the pockets. Actually, they’ve had you by the ass for as long as you’ve been alive. In your heart, you know it’s true. Don’t believe any of this? Read up on the 14th Amendment. Check out how “free” you really are. With the Act of 1871 and subsequent legislation such as the purportedly ratified 14th Amendment, our once-great nation of Sovereigns has been subverted from a Republic to a democracy. As is the case under Roman Civil Law, our ignorance of the facts has led to our silence. Our silence has been construed as our consent to become beneficiaries of a debt we did not incur. The Sovereign People have been deceived for hundreds of years into thinking they remain free and independent, when in actuality we continue to be slaves and servants of the corporation. Treason was committed against the People in 1871 by the Congress. This could have been corrected through the decades by some honest men (assuming there were some), but it was not, mainly due to lust for money and power. Nothing new there. Are we to forgive and justify this crime against the People? You have lost more freedom than you may realize due to corporate infiltration of the so-called government. We will lose more unless we turn away from a democracy that is the direct road to disaster — and restore our Constitutional Republic. In an upcoming article, we’ll take a closer look at the purportedly ratified 14th Amendment and how we became “property” of the corporation and enslaved by our silence. I am saddened to think about the brave men and women who were killed in all the wars and conflicts instigated by the Controllers. These courageous souls fought for the preservation of ideals they believed to be true — not for the likes of a corporation. Do you believe that any one of the individuals who have been killed as a result of war would have willingly fought if they knew the full truth? Do you think one person would have laid down his life for a corporation? I think not. If the People had known long ago to what extent their trust had been betrayed, I wonder how long it would have taken for another Revolution. What we need is a Revolution in THOUGHT. We change our thinking and we change our world. Callisto MT,Georgia,Book Antiqua,Palatino,Times New Roman,Serif;” face=”Callisto MT,Georgia,Book Antiqua,Palatino,Times New Roman,Serif”>Will we ever restore the Republic? That is a question I cannot answer yet. I hope, and most of all — pray — that WE, the Sovereign People, will work together in a spirit of cooperation to make it happen in this lifetime. I know I will give it my best shot — come what may. Our children deserve their rightful legacy — the liberty our ancestors fought so hard to give to us. Will we remain silent telling ourselves weare free, and perpetuate the MYTH? Or, do we stand as One Sovereign People, and take back what has been stolen from the house of our Republic? Something to think about — it’s called freedom.
I’m going to show you how this all come about. The research has been done for you to prove you are a slave to the corporation UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC.
THE UNITED STATES, INC.
There is a lot of useful information on this site so please check the entire site out.
Thomas J. DiLorenzoLegal scholar Gene Healy has made a powerful argument in favor of abolishing the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution. When a fair vote was taken on it in 1865, in the aftermath of the War for Southern Independence, it was rejected by the Southern states and all the border states. Failing to secure the necessary three-fourths of the states, the Republican party, which controlled Congress, passed the Reconstruction Act of 1867 which placed the entire South under military rule.
The purpose of this, according to one Republican congressman, was to coerce Southern legislators to vote for the amendment “at the point of a bayonet.” President Andrew Johnson called this tactic “absolute despotism,” the likes of which had not been exercised by any British monarch “for more than 500 years.” For his outspokenness Johnson was impeached by the Republican Congress.
The South eventually voted to ratify the amendment, after which two Northern states-Ohio and New Jersey-withdrew support because of their disgust with Republican party tyranny. The Republicans just ignored this and declared the amendment valid despite their failure to secure the constitutionally-required three-fourths majority.
The Cato Institute’s Roger Pilon, who is a supporter of the Fourteenth Amendment, has defended the way in which the amendment was adopted on the grounds that after the war some Southern states had enacted the “notorious Black Codes” (Liberty Magazine, Feb. 2000).
“What should Congress have done,” Pilon asked, “turn a blind eye to what was going on?” The notion that a racially-enlightened and benevolent Republican Congress unconstitutionally imposed the Fourteenth Amendment on the nation because it was motivated primarily (if not solely) out of concern with racial discrimination in the South is childishly naive and a historical. The fact is, Northern states pioneered viciously discriminatory “black codes” long before they existed in any Southern state, and these codes were supported by many of the same Northern politicians who voted for the Fourteenth Amendment.
There is a lot of useful information on this site so please check the entire site out. Link is at the bottom
To understand how to control government we must first understand what our government is. Once again, the United States of America is a nation of Sovereigns. That means, ‘a nation of Kings’.
From the beginning, the founding fathers (people) of our nation recognized that God gave them dominion, agency and possession then commanded them to be fruitful and multiply, replenish and subdue the earth. Those three elements: dominion, agency and possession, constitute the very definition of sovereignty. Respectively, by design, the people formed our government, to function of the people, by the people and for the people. When I went to school, they still taught the part about: “of the people, by the people and for the people;” but, the part about the people being sovereign was already lost. Since then, those that control the school system have completely eliminated the whole principle of “the people govern the government” from their curriculum. In its place they have instilled the illusion the government is there to protect you. Programs like D.A.R.E. go so far as to formally teach the students to be government agents policing their parents/guardians. However, much was lost when the people stopped learning about our history. Respectively, to learn how to control the government lawfully, we must first remember our history.
In the beginning, the King of Great Britain granted people freehold (Allodial) Title to the Land in America. Thus, those people were granted freedom—the right of self government—the right of kings. However, by the end of the French American War, Great Britain had almost taken control over the Americas through the contractual control of debts; both with the individual people and with the states. And, Great Britain had begun unlawfully usurping governmental powers as if it were their right. The 13 independent states responded by joining together to sign the Declaration of Independence; to stand against Great Britain’s unlawful attempts to take control over the governments. The War of Independence compelled those 13 states to unite under Articles of Confederation. However, the Articles of Confederation were significantly flawed (see: Articles of Confederation); largely because they were formed in a world made up of Monarchies; thus, under those Articles, the states were recognized as independent sovereign nation states; wielding the “collective sovereignty of the people” as if they were Kingdoms unto themselves—which was impossible, given that the people had not granted the government control over the independent peoples’ private freehold lands. The central government had no power to: unite the states, settle disputes, set a standard of money or even to martial an army for defense of the nation. When the War of Independence was over, the nation and the states were nearing bankruptcy; hard money was almost nonexistent anywhere in the nation, the people were literally starving and the government had no way to generate funds to pay the army. Congress was left with no choice but to send the soldiers home with nothing but a worthless written promise that their pay for the previous four years would come. The people made deals with banks, merchants and private capitalists to borrow grain (and seed) on the promise that they would repay with their crops (again there was no money available). Before the year was over the lenders went to the state legislatures to have the laws changed to compel the people to repay their grain loans in hard money, regardless of their contractual agreements. With the states’ shaky financial condition, and pressure from foreign lenders promising support if the legislation passed the bogus measures, the states changed the laws. When harvest time came the banks refused to accept payment according to the terms of loans; the people could not sell their crops for hard money because there was no money to be found; so, the courts put the people in debtor’s prison and foreclosed on their farms. Great Britain, France, Holland and Spain all stood by gobbling up cheap land from such foreclosures; yet they continued to hold their own ports closed to trade with American based ships; vying for who would be the kingdom that would pick up the pieces and become the new rulers over America, while the independent states battled each other over borders, tariffs and control of the rivers.
Something had to change or all would be lost. That’s when the Constitutional Republic was born. Visionary men like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, George Washington and the like petitioned the states to send representatives to Annapolis then to Philadelphia with authority from the states to fix the problem. The Governors and or State Legislatures of the individual states each sent deputies with authority to speak for their State. Those deputies used a Trust Indenture (contract) called, The Constitution for the United States of America to form the government and unite the nation’s states under one controlling Law. Under the new Constitution: the states were no longer recognized as independently sovereign, only the central government had the power to coin hard money and to regulate interstate commerce and foreign tariffs and trade; still the independent sovereign nature of the people was recognized along with their right to self government. Our Constitutional Republic government was now governed by law with the responsibility to govern itself and the states according to specific limitations specified in the Law; it was not given power to govern the people.
Acting as Senators, under the Constitution, the founding deputies sat George Washington in the seat of the President of the Constitutional United States of America. Note: they properly sat George Washington in that capacity, with their delegated authority, without a popular election.
Once the Constitutional Republic was created in trust and the President and Senators were seated, copies of the Constitution were distributed amongst the states for “ratification”. It is very important that we understand what ratification was. Could it have been that the individual States had to approve of the Constitution in order for it to have any affect? No. Ratification did not change the fact that the President and the Senate were already seated according to the Constitution. It was that the each State had to recognize that they were giving up their Articles of Confederation alleged state sovereignty and all of their right and title to all of the unappropriated public lands within each respective State. After that, the First Constitutional Congress was formed and the Bill of Rights was added to the former constitution to form The Constitution of the United States of America as a contract to which each officer of the Constitutional Republic must affirm an oath to uphold in order to serve in that office; and, thus our original jurisdiction government was formed.
However, today, what people generally see as the United States Government is not a government at all. Instead, it is a private ‘municipal corporation’ that was formed in, The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the actual government acting under martial law. That corporation trademarked the names: United States, U.S., USA, and America. We call that corporation: Corp. U.S. They adopted their own constitution (The United States Constitution) as one of their charter documents. It was identical to the national Constitution except that they dropped out the national 13th amendment (which amendment limited officers of government from raising themselves above the people), and renumbered the remaining amendments as the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to their Constitution of the United States. That left their constitution with one less amendment than the national constitution. They fixed that by adding their own 16th amendment without ratification. To the corporation, ratification was not necessary; after all, they created their constitution, by adoption, in 1871. What would keep them from doing the same thing with their corporate amendments? Nothing. In fact, in 1913, Corp. U.S. also adopted their 17th amendment (which designated that from then on Corp. U.S. Senators would be elected by popular vote). The Constitution forbids the original jurisdiction Congress from any authority to change where Senators are elected; therefore, Corp. U.S.’ 17th amendment can only apply to Corp. U.S.
Between Corp. U.S.’ creation, in 1871, and their adoption of their 17th Amendment, in 1913, the original jurisdiction government’s members of Congress wore two hats; one for their original jurisdiction seat and one for their respective seat in Corp. U.S.’ congress. However, in 1913, in accord with their adoption of their 17th Amendment, Corp. U.S. started to have their Corp. Senators elected by popular vote and the States stopped appointing Senators to the original jurisdiction government’s Congress; thus, removing Corp. U.S.’ management relationship from its tie to the Republic and in effect forming what appears to be a distinctively separate ‘Democratic Oligarchy’; which, if it were the government, would be repugnant to the Law’s of this nation.
In 1944, under The Bretton Woods Agreement, codified at USC Title 22 § 286, Corp. U.S.’ treasury was, in effect, given to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as their individual drawing account; thus, giving the appearance of foreign control; however, Corp. U.S.’ President was also given the authority to control the IMF’s governors and general managers.
Thus, from 1917, our nation’s original jurisdiction government (the Constitutional Republic) has been vacant. It’s vacant because people have forgotten who they are. It’s vacant because we forgot what Land ownership is. It’s vacant because we stopped seating national Senators. We forgot that Electors are, by definition, Land Owners.
Our nation’s government is vacant; thus, to control our government we first have to re-seat it. The first step to re-seating our government is understanding how it is lawfully seated.
The Constitution of the United States of America shows, the general popular vote of the people does not elect the President of this nation’s government; the Electoral College does. The Electoral College is made up of Electors. After an election the Electoral College’s votes are physically counted, before Congress, by the President of the Senate and if the outcome of the election favors a President Elect that is not otherwise constitutionally limited from serving as President, Congress ratifies the election; and, on January 20th following the election, seats the new President. If they do not ratify the election the Senate holds their own election and seats the President which may be of their own choosing. Either way, the Senate always seats the President.
Now, what would happen if there was no Senate seated? According to Law, the President cannot be seated except by the Senate. In 1917, when President Wilson was reelected by the Electoral College, ⅓ of the original jurisdiction Senate had already been vacated and the new Corp. U.S. only senators had replaced them; respectively, because those Corp. U.S. only senators were allowed to participate in the ratification of the vote, the only capacity any member of that ratifying Congress could have exercised was their Corp. U.S. authority; thus, President Wilson was only ratified into his Corp. U.S. seat and the original jurisdiction government seat for the President of the United States of America went vacant.
The result of this history is what we all see happening today: in our modern world people think that Corp. U.S. is their government and they are contractually controlled by it with nearly no way out. Corp. U.S. has legislatively ruled that the people of our nation are its enemies (the Trading with the Enemy Act). There is even evidence of their own involvement in killing Presidents (Kennedy), killing people (the Weavers at Ruby Ridge, Idaho, the Seventh-Day Adventist Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas and thousands more) and participating in terrorism of the people (The Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, The World Trade Center in New York, The Pentagon) so that they can justify things like: the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act, the Homeland Security Act, starting wars around the World, tighten security/control over the people of our nation and ObamaCare.
Remember, this nation was created by the people as a Republic, a government controlled by Law (not one that controls law and the people by its whim). Until the formation of Corp. U.S. the laws and statutes controlled the government not the people. Now, Corp. U.S. and the Corp. States under its control create thousands of statutes every year specifically designed to destabilize (or systematically destroy) our economy and force the people to only act under their will and control. Since W.W.II— the war against Fascism (settled by the Bretton Woods Agreement) — it seems like the thing most people think of as government became fascistic. However, now that they have forced the new world of Homeland Security upon us and we started looking at our actual history we discovered that through the social security cardholder relationship Corp. U.S. has secured ownership and control over the people and their property; thus, the only step left for them to execute a complete takeover of the sovereign people and transference of government control under their own form of dictatorial communism is for the people to revolt with arms. Make no mistake—that is their long range plan now coming into effect.
The rest are links provided for you to go to on your own to learn the real history of our so called “Government” (Corporation), that you are now a slave to the machine to.
These links have been archived to keep us from finding the truth, you have to really do your research to find them. Just one more thing they try to hide from you.
Act of 1871 BOOKSTORE Act of 1871 1871, February 21: Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871.
On the night of December 23, 1913 the United States Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act and thereby committed the greatest act of TREASON in history. It surrendered this nation’s sovereignty and sold the American people into slavery to a cabal of arch-charlatan international bankers who proceeded to plunder, bankrupt, and conquer this nation with a money swindle.
The “money” the banks issue is merely bookkeeping entries. It cost them nothing and is not backed by their wealth, efforts, property, or risk. It is not redeemable except in more debt paper. The Federal Reserve Act forced us to pay compound interest on thin air. We now use worthless “notes” backed by our own credit that we cannot own and are made subject to compelled performance for the “privilege”.
From 1913 until 1933, the United States paid the “interest” with more and more gold. The structured inevitability soon transpired: the Treasury was empty, the debt was greater than ever, and the United States declared bankruptcy. In exchange for using notes belonging to bankers who create them out of nothing on our own credit, we are forced to repay in substance (labor, property, land, businesses, resources, life in ever-increasing amounts. This may have been the greatest heist and fraud of all time.
When a government goes bankrupt, it loses its sovereignty. In 1933 the United States declared bankruptcy, as expressed in Roosevelt’s Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260, House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933, confirmed in Perry v. United States, (1935) 294 U.S. 330-381, 79 L.Ed 912, as well as 31 USC 5112, 5119, and 12 USC 95A. The bankrupt United States went into receivership, reorganized in favor of 115 creditors and new owners. In 1913, Congress turned over America… lock, stock and barrel to a handful of criminals whose avowed intent from the beginning was to plunder, bankrupt, conquer, and enslave the people of the United States of America and eliminate this nation from the face of the earth. The goal was, and is, to absorb America into a one-world private commercial government, a “New World Order.”
On March 9, 1933 President Roosevelt called for the passing of The WAR POWERS ACT TITLE 12 USC. Section 95 (a) and 95 (b). This act declared all United States Citizens to be the enemy of the United States Government, and placed us under permanent Emergency Rule, bypassing Constitutional constraints on government.
With the Erie R.R. v Tompkins case of 1938, the Supreme Court confirmed their success. We are now in an international private commercial jurisdiction in colorable admiralty-maritime under the Law Merchant. We have been conned and betrayed out of our sovereignty, rights, property, freedom, common law, Article III Courts, and
The Bill of Rights has been statutized into “civil rights” in commerce. You have destroyed the Republic. America has been stolen. We have been made slaves, i.e. permanent debtors, bankrupt, in legal incapacity, rendered commercial “persons,” “residents,” and corporate franchisees known as “citizens of the United States”
Since 1933 what is called the “United States Government” is a privately owned corporation of the Federal Reserve/International Monetary Fund. It is merely an instrument whereby the bankers administer their ongoing subjugation and plunder of what was once considered “the last great hope of human freedom.” All “public servants,” officials, Congressmen, politicians, judges, attorneys, law enforcement officers, States and their various agencies, etc., are the express agents of these foreign principals – see Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938; 22 USC 286 et seq, 263A, 185G, 267J, 611(C) (ii) & (iii); Treasury Delegation Order #91 – who have stolen the country by clever, intentional, and unrelenting fraud, trickery, treachery, non-disclosure, miss-representation, intrigue, coercion, conspiracy, murder. If there is a greater tragedy in human history it is hard to know what it is.
An insidious aspect of this is that “officials” like you may think you are “public servants,” are upholding the “law,” or other hoaxes. In truth you are conscientiously and assiduously serving the archenemies of yourselves, your own rights, your fellow citizens, continued human rights, life, and freedom in general. YOU are seditiously administering the plunder, bankruptcy, conquest, destruction, dismantling, and elimination of your country. YOU are systematically defrauding, extorting, impoverishing, and injuring human life on the basis of crimes and lies of such magnitude, depth, and proportions as to be beyond human comprehension.
Now you believe you can sell this nation to foreign powers with the stroke of a pen by Executive Order 12803, April 30, 1992.
By so doing, you are committing TREASON and PERFIDY so immense as “to make the angels weep.” If you and your fellow “officials” do not understand the real situation, you are ignorant, naive, deceived, and conned. You are sheer dupes. If you do know and are parties to it, you are guilty of evil and heinous BETRAYAL. You are in such case TRAITORS and CRIMINALS. All of you “in power” are therefore, either fools or knaves, either of which eminently invalidates your “authority” and renders null and void absolutely all-moral obligation to pay allegiance or to obey the TREASONOUS SYSTEM you enforce with such mechanical viciousness.
If, you, “public servants” had any shred left of humanity, awe, heart, clarity, sanity, access to your true being and conscience, you would instantly resign and do everything possible to inform the American people of their plight and help us retrieve our rights and our country. Only by such means can you even begin to atone for your endless crimes against humanity, the lives you so arrogantly and mindlessly butcher with the “meat-grinder of the law.”
What do you think the American people will do as they discover that they have no more country, that they are slaves to mortal enemies, that they have been tricked and betrayed by their “leaders” who sold them out? What do you think they will do when they realize that all their alleged “public servants” are willing or stupidly compliant parties to the plunder, bankruptcy, subjugation, and ruin of their lives and country?
There is no acceptable excuse for what you have done. You cannot engage in bringing harm to life and, like the Nazi’s defense at Nuremberg, presume that because you do so under the “authority” of an imaginary, abstract, unreal legal fiction called “government” you are freed of the consequences of your acts. Moral and natural law are not obviated by ignorance, hubris and self-righteous militancy. Your entire system – from the ground up – is deceit and fraud. It is illicit in essence and ab initio. As Broom’s Maxims 297, 729 put it: “A right of action cannot arise out of fraud.” Honor is earned by honesty and integrity, not under false and fraudulent pretenses. The color of the cloth one wears cannot cover up the usurpations, lies, and treachery. “When black is fraudulently declared to be white, not all will live in darkness.”
More and more Americans are awakening to the truth. What do you think the American people will do as they discover that they have no more country, that they are slaves to mortal enemies, that they have been tricked and betrayed by their “leaders” who sold them out? What do you think they will do when they realize that all their alleged “public servants” are willing or stupidly compliant parties to the plunder, bankruptcy, subjugation, ruin and destruction of their lives and country? Thomas Jefferson wrote: “An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.” Lincoln said: “Just as I would not be a slave, neither would I be a master.”
I will not participate in your corrupt, arrogant, and cruel fraud, either as perpetrator or victim. I will no longer sit here and writhe. The TYRANNY over this nation MUST END! End Emergency Rule. Repeal all laws passed under Emergency Rule. Give us back our substance and our law. Give us back our Republican form of government.
If you continue with this course, you will have natural and moral law and higher powers to answer to, not to mention all those you have wronged under color of law. You will have your own laws turned against you, as you have turned the law against us. To transform the shield of protection into a sword of exploitation, subjugation, and plunder is perfidy. I am an American. My destiny is to live as a freeman on the land my forefathers conquered and that I will fight to keep.
You have now been placed on notice. All further actions on your part will be willful!
Resolutely, from an American who demands their country back
A very big “THANK YOU” to all contributing author’s of this blog for making it possible for me to spread the truth.
As always Thank You for reading and watching sorry this one was so long much needed information to expose.
“Simply put, this is not just the best film I’ve seen on 911, it’s the best film I have seen all year.” – Sergeant John Meaders, 32 year ex Californian police officer
“One of the best 911 movies ever made!” – Kevin Barrett, Truth Jihad Radio
“All family members of a 9/11 victim should watch this film.” – Matt Campbell, victim family member
“Incontrovertible is technically brilliant” – Ian Henshall, Author ‘9/11 Revealed’ & ‘9/11 The New Evidence’
“Moving, powerful & informative” – Niels Harrit, Veteran Truth Campaigner
“Artfully crafted – manages to convince cumulatively that there are still questions to answer” – Joe Gill – Journalist – Middle East Eye
“Absolutely first rate! The film manages to navigate the broad aspects of 9/11, with all the complexity, and even tie it with 7/7 and JFK, while avoiding the pitfalls of discredited speculative theories. I have no hesitation in sharing this with anyone” – David Chandler, retired physics teacher.
—————
Please support the film maker, Tony Rooke, by purchasing a DVD or Blu-ray DVD of the film from his website
Please distribute copies of the film to serving police officers, fire fighters and military personnel.
If you live in the UK, stop funding the purposes of terrorism.
Section 15 Article 3 of the Terrorism Act (2000) states:
(3) A person commits an offence if he— (a) provides money or other property, and (b) knows or has REASONABLE CAUSE to suspect that it will or may be used for the purposes of terrorism.
This film gives us more than REASONABLE CAUSE to suspect that in the UK we are ALL guilty of funding the purposes of terrorism through our taxes and funding of the BBC.
Before beginning the next part of this series, I would like to ask two critical questions:
1. How did a country founded on Christian principles become so apostate?
The comprehensive answer to this question has many contributing factors. However, there is one in particular that should enrage anyone who has affection for either this country or the souls of its progeny. That is the systematic teaching of evolution in a manner that tears down the faith of young minds through the use of clever arguments based on lies and distorted interpretations of the facts. To be clear, an honest and sincere examination of all theories of origins is scientifically acceptable. In so doing, truth will fall where it should fall. However, the facts presented in current teachings are tortured to fit a theory that is irrational and in many cases, conflicts with known facts and laws of genetics, as well as direct observation. And as far as the separation of church and state goes: if it is acceptable to teach a theory implying that a religiously held belief is perhaps incorrect, then teaching another theory that supports a religiously held belief may be correct should also be acceptable. After all, schools in America should not exist to promote one ideology over another. They should exist to promote academic education, which never thrives in the face of censorship.
This begs the next question: 2. Where is the outrage?
To those that claim to have found peace with the theory of evolution by coming to the conclusion that God could have brought everything into existence through evolution: that is NOT what His Word tells us. His Word tells us that He created everything in six days – and a scholarly translation of those six days means a literal 24-hour period and not six days composed of thousands of years. Our children very clearly understand that if evolution is true then God is either a liar or non-existent. Science through the use of evolution tries to answer that question. Therefore, since this is perhaps one of the most important questions a human being can ask themselves, an honest presentation of science is paramount. It affects the way a human being may live, which also affects the culture in which that human may live.
Part IV of this commentary on Pearson/Prentice Hall’s Biology 2006 textbook by Miller and Levine will concentrate on embryology, imagined by several people in the distant past but first made popular by Ernest Haeckel.
Evaluation ; – Page 385 –
Similarities in Embryology The early stages, or embryos, of many animals with backbones are very similar…What do these similarities mean? (Emphasis as it appears in the textbook.)
Darwin also had something to say about the necessary similarities of embryos that his theory pre-supposed.
He stated:
“Generally the embryos of the most distinct species belonging to the same class are
closely similar, but become, when fully developed, widely dissimilar. “
Ernst Haeckel, a contemporary of Darwin, ran with this concept and drew diagrams of selected animals to demonstrate this commonality.
Background: in order for embryology (the study of the growth and development of embryos from conception to birth) to support evolution, Darwin and Haeckel claimed that the evolutionary history of vertebrate species can be seen in its embryonic stages. In other words, invertebrate animals go through the same stages of development as their predecessors and in so doing, repeat the embryonic stages of their evolutionary predecessors before developing into their evolved stage. Haeckel went so far as to create a very scientific-sounding name for his theory. He called it “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”: “ontogeny” meaning changes in growth and development patterns and “phylogeny” meaning the evolutionary history of a species, and “recapitulates” being somewhat repetitive and meaning that during the embryonic period of an animal’s life, it repeats the development stages of its evolutionary ancestor. Both Haeckel and Darwin believed that this was evidence that these species shared a common ancestor.
But are the early stages, or embryos, of many animals with backbones similar, as the book claims?
Page 385, Figure 15-17, which presents a picture of a chicken, turtle and rat in their embryonic stage states:
In their early stages of development, chickens, turtles, and rats look similar, providing
evidence that they shared a common ancestry…
Counterpoint – Is this true? Once again, the facts have been twisted and/or left out to give the appearance of truth. The book admits that Haeckel “fudged” to make the earliest stages of some embryos seem more similar than they actually are. But it also goes on to say immediately afterward:
“Errors aside, however, it is clear that the same groups of embryonic cells, develop in the same order and in similar patterns to produce the tissues and organs of all (emphasis mine) vertebrates.”
This statement is more than misleading. To be kind, I will say it is disingenuous. Not only was Haeckel exposed as a fraud during his lifetime because the drawings he produced were altered to fit his theory, but he also handpicked embryos that happened to look somewhat similar and concluded that all vertebrate embryos at the earliest stages of development appear to be similar. For example, he disregarded the images of fishes and amphibians within their own classification that looked significantly different and at the earliest stages of development. Disregarding any examples that contradict your theory does not qualify as including all!
There is a point in development where some embryos look similar but that is for a very brief period and not at the early stages, as claimed and as would be expected. From the time of conception and as the cell divides, the stages of development are extremely different. Additionally, the features that look similar turn out to develop into very different organs for very different functions. In other words, Haeckel chose the examples that best fit his theory and artistically altered them. Then he disregarded the many examples that contradicted his theory. Of course, students are not told that the differences are evident in the early stages of development, as well as the cell movements from the time of fertility through mature development.
Today some biology books still go as far as telling students that the folds in the neck areas of embryos represent gill slits that are evidence of our early stages of evolutionary development – in spite of the fact that we now know that these folds are called pharyngeal “clefs” or “pouches” and develop into the inner ear and parathyroid gland in other species – including humans!
The problems that genetics present for this position are also ignored, including the fact that DNA and RNA prevent the reproduction of any species with another species, which if thought through the theory presumes. In other words, if different species developed at different embryological stages, that new species would not be able to reproduce unless another new species of the same kind developed at the same time and in the same geographic location and somehow they managed to connect. Genetics also dictates that from conception onward, the genetic codes of each species is very specific and only in rare occasions will it allow for hybrid reproductions, which usually are sterile and do not happen naturally .
Regardless of the evidence, the iconographic pictures of altered embryos remains one of evolutions strongest arguments for common ancestry and some version of these continue to appear in this textbook as well as others.
Why? Why would textbooks keep regurgitating failed theories when they state that support for these failed theories exist? If that were true, why would they not present the successful and perfected theories instead? This textbook does the same when it comes to the Miller-Urey experiments, discussed in Part 2 of this series. It presents the failed theory and/or experiment, states that other successful experiments and/or theories exist to support it, but then neglects to present those theories.
In the words of one of the world’s most prominent evolutionist, the late Stephen Jay Gould:
“The iconography of persuasion strikes even closer than words to the core of our being.
Every demagogue, every humorist, every advertising executive, has known and exploited
the evocative power of a well-chosen picture…These are the most potent sources of conformity, since ideas passing as descriptions lead us to equate the tentative with the unambiguously factual. “
And I would like to add: when pictures appear in textbooks and are presented by a teacher in a classroom with all kinds of scientific-sounding assertions, the authority of their word prevails against the undeveloped critical thinking skills of students. To make matters worse, parents all over the world have neglected their biblical directive to personally educate their children (see Prov. 24:3ff) and the secularists have been more than happy to fill in the gap. Yet we dare to wonder how a country founded on Christian principles became so apostate? There is no mystery here – just an honest look at classrooms across America and their textbooks provide the answer.
Question from TPATH to RoseAnn: Please understand that I am not disputing your statement regarding the true intent and meaning of the the length of a day as you described at the beginning of this PART IV. However, as there any other reference in the Old or New Testament that will confirm that statement? This question was inspired by the written accounts that Moses lived beyond 500 years of age. Could this have been or is there a misconception in the actual length of a year, a day, etc.?
Operation Jade Helm 15: Exercise to end all exercises?
DoomProfessor2 details some interesting points regarding the full Jade Helm 15 operations. The connections put forward are very alarming if only half were true. The unconventional urban warfare operations
Are you unsure about what our military will do if martial law is enacted? Are you unsure what all of the Helicopter exercises in big cities were all about? With everything we know so far about Jade Helm, the story officials tell us do not add up to an exercise for use overseas!
CORRECTION: I state in video name of Military person who spoke with Newspaper reporter was same name as Bastrop Tx Jade Helm official. That was incorrect.
Article History Note:
The first Model 369 prototype flew on 27 February 1963. Originally designated the YHO-6A under the army’s designation system, the aircraft was redesignated the YOH-6A under the Department of Defense‘s new joint system in 1962. Five prototypes were built, fitted with a 252 shp (188 kW) AllisonT63-A-5A, and delivered to the U.S. Army at Fort Rucker, Alabama to compete against the other 10 prototype aircraft submitted by Bell and Fairchild-Hiller. In the end, Hughes won the competition and the Army awarded a contract for production in May 1965. The initial order was for 714 aircraft, but that was later increased to 1,300 with an option to buy another 114. Seventy helicopters were built in the first month.
Video Description:
JADE HELM. What is it? What are the details? Should I be concerned? What are the symbols? Who are the actors? Learn the secrets of JADE HELM 15 in this special report: JADE HELM: DECODED.
We need your help to spread the word on how to “Abolish the Corporate Government” so please, you have our permission to copy, paste, remix, repost, ect… to get the message out to as many people as you can. Our so called Government is nothing more than a bunch of money hungry Satanists who wish to control this entire planet, and to depopulate it, exterminate us from existence, we have to stop them, one way is to spread the truth about them, and what they are trying to do to us. So please help us do this.
TPATH ~ May 3, 2015 ~ As discussed in Parts 1 and 2 of this series, I will be reviewing the most popular biology textbook in America, Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2006, Biology, written by Kenneth R. Miller and Joseph S. Levine. I am doing so to offer a “counterpoint” to their interpretation of origins, which has been cleverly designed by the authors to mislead students through psychological manipulations, tortured interpretations of the facts, and downright lies. It is my hope that this work will serve as an instrument for parents and church leaders in defending the biblical account of origins that is being assaulted in academia and used as a tool to tear down the students’ trust in the Word of God – and subsequently to challenge their faith in the existence of God Himself.
Before beginning my counterpoint argument against Punctuated Equilibrium, as presented on page 439 of the textbook, it is necessary to establish the importance of qualifying something as a “theory.”
Page 14 – correctly defines how a theory is developed. It states:
In science, the word theory applies to a well-tested explanation that unifies a
broad range of observations. A theory enables scientists to make accurate predictions
about new situations. (Emphasis as it appears in the textbook.)
Counterpoint – The book mentions but cleverly does not stress the importance of making accurate predictions that testing is supposed to verify. And it also does not address the many predictions Darwin made about his “theory” that the evidence has disqualified. Most noteworthy, Darwin made several predictions that can be found in his Origin of Species, 6th edition, chapters 6, 10, 15. He correctly predicted:
If my theory be true, numberless varieties, linking closely together all the species
of the same group, must assuredly have existed…
The number of intermediate and transitional links between all living and extinct
species, must have been inconceivably great…
An interminable number of intermediate forms must have existed…
Darwin’s predictions were legitimate and logical. If his theory was true, certainly there would have been an enormous amount of transitional fossils for all categories of life. At the time Darwin made these predictions, the fields of paleontology (the study of the history of living organisms) and geology were young and burgeoning sciences. Over a century and a half later, that is no longer the case.
So what about the “well-tested” explanation of the theory mentioned on page 14 of the textbook? Has science documented in the quantities Darwin predicted the gradual transition from one living species to another referred to as Descent with Modification?
The answer is a loud and resounding NO!!!!!!!!!!!!
Despite the facts, evolutionists will tell you that there are numerous transitional fossils that have been found as evidence of evolution. I will devote another segment of this series to examine the so-called “evidences of evolution”, and argue that they should more properly be called “evidences of deception.”
What does the real evidence show?
In 1999, Prof. Steve Jones of University College of London published his own version of Darwin’s Origin of Species. On page 252 of this publication, Almost Like a Whale, he stated:
The fossil record – in defiance of Darwin’s whole idea of gradual change – often makes
great leaps from one form to the next. Far from the display of intermediates to be
expected from slow advance through natural selection many species appear without
warning, persist in fixed form and disappear, leaving no descendants. Geology assuredly does not reveal any finely graduated organic chain, and this is the most obvious and
gravest objection which can be urged against the theory of evolution.
Contrary to the predictions made by Darwin, gradualism from a common ancestor in the fossil record is nowhere to be found. After over a century and a half of paleontological and geological research, the fossil record shows that there was a sudden explosion of life forms at what evolutionists call the Cambrian period and these life forms continue the same as we observe them today. In light of strong evidence to the contrary, the theory of evolution has not abandoned its suppositions; instead it has attempted to explain the evidence in a way to make it conform to their theory.
How have evolutionists tortured the evidence to fit their theory?
They have proposed that life continues in a static way until there is a sudden and rapid genetic change in a small period of time. The idea was first proposed by German geneticist Richard Goldschmidt in the 1940s and 50s. It was called the Hopeful Monster Hypothesis. Aside from the laughable suggestion that lacks logic as well as a mechanism, the idea that all of a sudden one species rapidly changes enough to give birth to another species in a small period of time is beyond ridiculous – aside from which there is no supporting evidence. And if it were true, these “hopeful monsters” would have to mate with other hopeful monsters to survive as a species – the odds of which are exponential at best. Additionally, if true, all pregnant women would have cause for concern.
Evolutionists realized they had to explain the sudden appearance of life forms in the Cambrian geologic level in a more scientific-sounding manner. So, rather than abort their theology in light of contrary evidence, they re-invented the Hopeful Monster Hypothesis and now call it Punctuated Equilibrium.
Page 439 –
…Some species, such as horseshoe crabs, have changed very little from the time they
first appeared in the fossil record. In other words, much of the time these species are in
a state of equilibrium. At several points in the fossil record, changes in animals and plants occurred over relatively short periods of time. Some biologists suggest that most
new species are produced by periods of rapid change.
Counterpoint – Saying “some” species have changed very little in the fossil record is disingenuous at best, as is the claim that the fossil record bears evidence of rapid change. It does not. Every species that survived did so as it first appeared in the fossil record. The book goes on to try to explain how this rapid development may have occurred after mass extinctions. Again, this suggestion is made as a way of proposing a logical way for this evolutionary problem to be solved, and it is totally based on faith and not evidence.
Page 439 (continued) – Scientists use the term punctuated equilibrium to describe this pattern of long, stable periods interrupted by brief periods of more rapid change. (Emphasis as it appears in the textbook.)
Counterpoint – Again: there is no evidence to support these “brief periods of more rapid change.” Additionally, the obvious problems with this theory are many:
• There is a sudden explosion of life forms in the fossil record in the Cambrian period, and they continue to exist today as they did back then.
• One species giving birth to another is genetically and observably unsupportable – even if the change happened rapidly.
• If the impossible happened and a “hopeful monster” did exist, another hopeful monster would have to exist at the same time and in the same geographical location in order for the species to reproduce.
• An explanation for the mechanism that produces this type of rapid genetic change has evaded even the most creative evolutionist’s mind.
• Intermediate or transitional forms from a common ancestor in the fossil record have not been found in over 150 years of research – even evidence of rapid change should have been discovered in this length of time. And the ones they claim to be “evidence” have all been discounted or just plain stretches of the imagination.
In conclusion, the explosion of life at the Cambrian period not only contradicts any plausible explanation for evolution but supports the biblical account wherein we are told that every life form was created in the first week of the creation. A prediction to support the biblical narrative would state that we can expect to find a sudden explosion of life at one point in time, which is just what the evidence reveals. So while unbelievers scramble to create a theory to explain the facts that somehow seems believable to unbelievers, they must rely on faith NOT evidence.
In the words of the late Dr. Duane Gish: “It is unbelievable what unbelievers have to believe to be unbelievers.”
And to that, I say AMEN!
NOTE FROM TPATH: Over the billion years, give or take a few hundred million, since the earth has supported life and over those billion years, approximately 50 billion life forms have existed. However, out of that massive architecture of time and creature there exists only one species aware of life and death, past and future and a desire to comprehend the vastness of his world.
If uncontrolled or undesigned evolution were the only mechanism for the advancement of all species, should there not be hundreds, thousands or even millions of evolved creatures which had reached that level of “random evolution”?
April 24, 2015 ~TPATH~ As discussed in Part 1 of this series, it has become my mission to present a counterpoint to what is being taught in high school biology classes in a manner designed to challenge the faith of students. In an effort to accomplish this mission, I will be reviewing the most popular biology book in America, Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2006, Biology, written by Kenneth R. Miller and Joseph S. Levine.
Part 1 focused on Darwinian evolution, which presented the theory with much psychological manipulation and innuendos designed to make the student believe evolution is well-supported by the facts and any other theory is for the mentally-challenged. Part 2 will focus on the teachings of the origination of organic molecules, and the misrepresentations and downright lies associated with the Miller-Urey experiment.
Charles Darwin acknowledged the need for a way for organic matter to “evolve” from inorganic matter. In other words, he recognized that there had to be a way for life to evolve from non-life – or a bunch of chemicals. The book tries to address this problem by discussing the Miller-Urey experiment in a way that is both misleading and intellectually dishonest.
On page 424, in the first two sentences in the section entitled THE FIRST ORGANIC MOLECULES, the problem is accurately presented. The book acknowledges that atoms cannot assemble themselves into living cells, and that the oxygen in our atmosphere would destroy many kinds of organic molecules that are protected within a cell. That’s just about where the honesty ends. The next sentence declares that the early Earth was different – inferring that the atmosphere was different. The first paragraph ends with a sentence: Could organic molecules have evolved under those conditions?
Counterpoint – First, the problem is acknowledged, then the student is cleverly led to believe that the problems we observe today may not have existed in the past. This is an important assumption, since circumstances would have to have been different in order to support different experimental observations: that the oxygen in our atmosphere would not allow such an evolution to occur.
But is the assumption correct?
In order to circumvent the oxygen problem, evolutionists have proposed that the early atmosphere did not contain oxygen. Then they go on to assume that the oxygen problem would gradually change as primitive life produced oxygen through processes such as photosynthesis. Aside from the fact that geological and paleontological research has revealed that an oxygen-based atmosphere must have existed from the earliest times, the argument is circular at best. In other words, if the presence of oxygen in the early atmosphere would prevent the evolution of life from non-life and the argument is that oxygen would have slowly been produced from primitive life, you should be asking: if you can’t produce life with oxygen in the atmosphere, how can life produce the oxygen? If you’re confused, you should be.
Page 424 – presents the Miller-Urey experiment as a possible answer to their dilemma. In this experiment back in the 1950s, Stanley Miller and Harold Urey designed an experiment where they added hydrogen, methane, ammonia, and water to represent the atmosphere of the early Earth. They did NOT add oxygen. Then they passed an electrical current through the mixture to simulate lightening.
The book goes on to say that the results were “spectacular” because the experiment produced several amino acids, which are the building blocks of proteins. Then it declares:
Miller and Urey’s experiments suggested how mixtures of the organic compounds
necessary for life could have arisen from simpler compounds present on a primitive Earth.
Counterpoint – The book conveniently omits the fact that the proteins created were the wrong kind needed for life.
Page 424 continued – Under Figure 17-8 of the experiment, the book states in an egregiously misleading way (a downright lie, actually):
This and other experiments suggest how simple compounds found on the early Earth could have combined to form the organic compounds needed for life.
It concludes this section by admitting that the simulations used by Miller-Urey were inaccurate but goes on to say:
However, similar experiments based on more current knowledge of Earth’s early atmosphere have also produced organic compounds…
Counterpoint – Oh – where to start! Let’s begin with a logical question:
If the unsuccessful Miller-Urey experiment was succeeded by successful experiments,
why did the authors go into detail about the unsuccessful experiment and exclude any information about the “similar experiments” that they imply were successful?
Perhaps the answer is that the organic compounds that were created over the past 60 some odd years were just as unsuccessful for the origination of life as the experiment in question – regardless of what the authors would have students believe. What the students are not told is that the amino acids produced in the experiment were the wrong types of proteins to produce life and that the atmosphere created was basically irrelevant, as were the rest of the conditions produced in the experiment.
Here’s another critical question that demands an answer regarding the origination of a cell:
If somehow we were able to create in a laboratory experiment a situation where carbohydrates, lipids, and nucleic acids were produced, would we have created a living cell?
The answer is still a loud and resounding NO!!!!!!!!
Today we know that cells are much more than an assemblage of chemicals. They are complex machines that perform a myriad of functions to produce and sustain life. You see, the question is not whether organic molecules can be synthesized in a laboratory, the question is how can molecules (first inorganic, which then evolve into organic) produce living cells – or how can life evolve from non-life?
After over a half of a century of experimentation, evolutionists still can’t create the right types of proteins in the right conditions to produce life, never mind trying to figure out how genetic codes are created. But somehow – someway – they manage to present their failures to our children in a manner that makes them seem credible. However, it is the responsibility of parents to teach truth to their children. Somehow – someway – we have delegated that responsibility to strangers, and then we are surprised by the strange ideas that our children have been indoctrinated into believing. Hence, this series is being written to assist parents in teaching the truth. Hopefully, they will do just that – for if they do, the truth will most definitely prevail.
After agonizing over the condition of America today, I have realized that many of our problems are attributable to an increasingly godless culture rooted in the teachings of evolution. It is illogical to expect our children to live by God’s moral codes established in Genesis, or that our rights come from God, when they are taught that His creation account is nothing more than a myth. It is also disturbing that the “evidences” for evolution were founded upon fallacious interpretations of observable data and the successful censoring of opposing points of view.
Therefore, it has become my mission to present a counterpoint to what is being taught in order to rescue our children from being led down an academic path that mocks our faith with innuendos and inferences based on a worldview that is neither scientifically supportable nor logical. The atheistic theology being presented to our children disguised as authoritative and empirical science through twisted conclusions and cleverly constructed insinuations is as much an insult to our intelligence as it is to our faith.
In this series I will be evaluating Pearson/Prentice Hall’s Biology textbook, 2006, written by Kenneth R. Miller and Joseph S. Levine that was adopted by the state of Texas, which asserts significant influence on textbook selections throughout the nation. Additionally, Pearson’s website also acknowledges that the mirror-like Miller & Levine iBiology Textbooks are the world’s bestselling high school biology programs.
The first article in this series will focus on the basics of Darwinian evolution presented in Chapter 15 of the book. It sets the stage with psychological coercion and straw men arguments that sophomores in high school lack the critical thinking skills to defend against. Direct quotes from the book will appear in italics prefaced with the page numbers for easy reference. The bold lettering included is copied as it appears in the textbooks. Subsequent articles will focus on the Miller Urey experiment, Haeckel’s embryos, the evolution of birds, homology, and possibly other subjects as I may deem appropriate as this project develops.
Evaluation
Page 369-
What scientific explanation can account for the diversity of life? The answer is a collection of scientific facts, observations, and hypotheses known as evolutionary theory. Evolution, or change over time, is the process by which modern organisms have descended from ancient organisms. A scientific theory is a well-supported testable explanation of phenomena that have occurred in the natural world.
Counterpoint – The answer provided to the question above is presented as the only credible explanation for origins. The way it is structured dismisses the growing and overwhelming support for creationism as being a legitimate possibility. The claim that evolution is credible becomes authoritative in the students’ minds, who are led to believe that it is well-supported by facts. They are not told that the data that will be discussed neither supports nor denies evolution or creationism. It is simply data that is subject to interpretation. In evolution, the theory drives the interpretation of the data to fit a naturalistic worldview as opposed to a supernatural worldview that requires intervention. In order to twist the data to fit the theory, impartiality is sacrificed – many times in a tortured manner, as this work will reveal.
Although it is true, as the book states, that natural selection occurs and the fittest do survive better than those that are unfit, survival is not a proof of evolution, as the students are led to believe. Dr. Walt Brown in his book In the Beginning, stated it best. He said: Natural selection cannot produce new genes; it only selects among preexisting characteristics.” He goes on to say, “While natural selection occurred, nothing evolved, and in fact, some biodiversity was lost…In other words, while natural selection sometimes explains the survival of the fittest, it does not explain the origin of the fittest…” I will add to Dr. Brown’s critique by saying that not only doesn’t natural selection explain the origin of the fittest, neither has Darwin nor any of his successors ever proposed a mechanism that adds information to the genetic code that would result in the evolution of a new creature.
Since the scientific criteria for a good theory requires that it should be repeatable, observable, predictable , and falsifiable, obviously any theory regarding origins cannot fully comply with this standard. Regardless, the authors of this textbook do their best to make the student believe that their theory is beyond challenge and is observable. To be sure, there is observation but it is the observation of impartial data that can be used to support Intelligent Design just as easily as it can be used to support Evolution, as will be discussed in a future article on homology. When data supports two conflicting theories, it is deceptive to claim that it proves only one of the theories.
Pg. 372 –
Darwin observed that the characteristics of many animals and plants varied noticeably among the different islands of the Galapagos. After returning to England, Darwin began to wonder if animals living on different islands had once been members of the same species. According to this hypothesis, these separate species would have evolved from an original South American ancestor species after becoming isolated from one another. Was this possible? If so, it would turn people’s view of the natural world upside down.
Counterpoint – The observations being made are not proof of evolution in progress but observations of diversity within the plant and animal kingdoms. The book also draws the conclusion that this observation alone was an assault on the prevailing view at the time – inferring “creationism.”
Furthermore, diversity within a family (phyla) can be observed and is NOT evolution at all. For instance, it is believed by both creationists and evolutionists that all the breeds of dogs known today have descended from the gray wolf – with many of the breeds being the result of selective breeding over the past century. This “observable” diversity that resulted from breeding – whether selective or natural – is not evidence of evolution, since the traits of the resulting animals were traits that existed in the gray wolf from the beginning. Breeding just “selects” certain heritable traits over others. However, evolutionists would have you believe that the diversity that we can observe in progress in dogs, represents evolution of other animals in the fossil record. This defies logic.
Ironically, diversity in the animal kingdom resulting from natural or selective breeding supports the biblical account of Noah bringing two of every animal into the Ark. Creationists have long argued that Noah only had to bring the original type of the animal into the ark and not all the species of the animal that have been developed over time. This theory reduces the number of animals necessary to repopulate the planet. Once again, the data used to support the theory of evolution also supports the theory of the Noah’s Flood, and therefore cannot be used as proof for either.
PG. 373-
Explorers were traversing the globe, and great thinkers were beginning to challenge established views about the natural world…
Most Europeans in Darwin’s day believed that the Earth and all its forms of life had been created only a few thousand years ago…Rocks and major geological features were thought to have been produced suddenly by catastrophic events that humans rarely, if ever, witnessed.
Counterpoint – If students are led to believe that the evolutionists represent the “great thinkers”, does that imply that creationists represent the “backward thinkers”? This is also a direct reference to Noah’s Flood as being the catalyst for the geological features. It seems references to intelligent design can be censored based on separation of church and state and the inferences of a “Designer” but derogatory remarks that insinuate creationists are intellectually challenged are permissible.
Additionally, this is also a blatant lie. We can “observe” in the scientific sense, that catastrophic events produce many of the geologic features we see today. Case in point: Mount St. Helens. This observable eruption in May of 1980 produced much of the strata layers that evolutionists claim are the result of successive layers of sediment deposited over long periods of time – and it did it in a 24-hour period! Additionally, the flume experiment produced the same laboratory results (see: http://www.icr.org/article/experiments-stratification/) which can be repeated, observed, falsified, and predicted.
Page 380-
The Struggle for Existence …Darwin realized that high birth rates and a shortage of life’s basic needs would eventually force organisms into competition for resources. The struggle for existence means that members of each species compete regularly to obtain food, living space, and other necessities of life…This struggle for existence was central to Darwin’s theory of evolution.
Counterpoint – Direct observation of Darwin’s realizations stated in the above text contradicts this statement. For instance, human beings gravitate toward cities to live in, where they do not compete in the ways described above. Their gathering together enables them to share resources. This is also true in the animal kingdom. There are flocks, herds, packs, colonies, etc., etc. In all these instances animals live together and do not compete with each other but cooperate for survival, all of which disproves Darwin’s central premise.
Page 381-
Over time, natural selection results in changes in the inherited characteristics of a population. These changes increase a species’ fitness in its environment.
DESCENT WITH MODIFICATION Darwin proposed that over long periods, natural selection produces organisms that have different structures, establish different niches, or occupy different habitats…Each living species has descended, with changes, from other species over time. He referred to this principle as descent with modification.
Counterpoint – Survival of the Fittest does not equate to evolution. The fittest do survive but they do not evolve. A fit cat will never become any other type of animal, no matter how many years pass by. The developing science of genetics as well as direct observation supports the biblical claim that animals reproduce after their own kind.
AND.. “descent with modification” remains an atheist’s dream. The modifications – or diversity – within any living species is dependent upon the genes that exist within their gene pool. As stated previously, neither Darwin nor any of his followers, have ever proposed a mechanism that adds information into a gene pool that would allow for the procreation of an animal or plant that differs from the options that exist within the gene pool of their parents. If it did, every pregnant woman would have cause for concern.
The section on Darwinian evolution ends with the following statements:
Page 387-
Scientific advances in many fields of biology along with geology and physics, have confirmed and expanded most of Darwin’s hypotheses….researchers still debate such important questions as precisely how new species arise and why species become extinct. There is also uncertainty about how life began.
Counterpoint – The advances referred to in this statement are as convoluted as the “evidences” detailed in this book. The last sentence, however, does contain a modicum of truth for evolutionists. In fact, they will remain uncertain about how life began for as long as they refuse to acknowledge the existence of a supernatural Creator.
July 4 Patriot speaks out against the Government. His face is covered because while in the military you not allowed to speak out against the government.
I ask you if you do NOT know your “Constitution” please go to this link and read it for your self, your children, grandchildren ect…
Also check out this page it has all the links to everything you could ever want to know about all the lies our Government has ever told through out history and what you need to know or do.
There is so much to be taught that you have been mislead for so long now by your Government and Main Stream Media that it is going to be hard for you to wrap your head around but you can do it if you really want your FREEDOM back, and this once great country. And what it was founded on.
Thank You for reading and watching. “LET FREEDOM RING” once again, For Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness of all. God will Not Bless a Nation in this way who has strayed so far from their roots, we must find our way back.
“When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.” Thomas Jefferson
“The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” Thomas Jefferson
“This institution will be based on the illimitable freedom of the human mind. For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it.”
– Thomas Jefferson to William Roscoe, December 27, 1820
“My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.” – Thomas Jefferson
I could keep going, but I will leave you with this,
The statement, “the Bible is the source of liberty” has not been found in any writings of Thomas Jefferson.
The first known appearance of this quotation, attributed to Jefferson, is in the book Our Public Schools – Christian or Secular, by Renwick Harper Martin. It could possibly be an inaccurate paraphrase of the famous line in the Declaration of Independence, “…they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” However, “endowed by their Creator with…Liberty” is not equivalent to “the Bible is the source of liberty.”
This quotation has also appeared as the prelude to a longer quotation: “The Bible is the source of liberty. I have always said, and I always will say, that the studious perusal of the sacred volume will make better citizens.” This complete quotation appears, attributed to Jefferson, in the published transcript of a Senate Subcommittee hearing in 1954.
The second part of this quotation (starting with “I have always said…”) has a much older pedigree. Daniel Webster, in a letter he wrote in 1852, described a conversation he had with Jefferson some twenty-seven years earlier, in which (Webster says) Jefferson said, “I have always said, and always will say, that the studious perusal of the sacred volume will make better citizens, better fathers, and better husbands.” This letter first appeared in print in the Christian Union in 1875; the letter had been discovered and submitted to the Christian Union by a Mr. John Abbott of Fairhaven, Connecticut, who explained that the letter had been saved by a friend of his who had corresponded with Webster. Abbott commented that “It seemed to me just one of those letters which would go the rounds of the newspapers and never be forgotten.” Webster’s recounting of Jefferson’s comments in the letter have indeed had a remarkable lifespan, although, like “the Bible is the source of liberty,” Webster’s story has not been confirmed in Jefferson’s own writings.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights; that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”-Thomas Jefferson
Since 1871 the United States president and the United States Congress has been playing politics under a different set of rules and policies. If you want to know more go here,
http://spiritwolf04.com/2012/06/29/abolish-the-corporate-government-of-1871-our-sovereignty-was-stolen-from-us/
I am passionate about people and our freedoms that God gave us as people, per our organic constitution, and our Government today and as of 144 years ago they have slowly been taken our rights and freedoms away, I'm here to let people know the lies and deceit that the governments around the world and the main stream media have been telling the American people, all the propaganda they have been spreading to keep you in fear and in slaved. I also come from a military background both Marine and Army. I see the corruption that is going on within the the "Government". They have taken God out, we know what happens when we take God out, we will fall.
